Public warning

Worst Workplace to Work

A public, verifiable signal that a workplace's own employees rated it below 75%. Not a punishment, but an early-warning diagnostic — free, honest data that flags culture risk before it shows up in attrition or Glassdoor, with employees protected from retaliation and a clear, documented path back through a re-survey.

< 75%
Score trigger
Open
Validity
15
Categories audited
10 days
Appeal window

What the designation means

A structured, appealable, employee-verified warning, not an anonymous rumor.

A public warning

Issued when verified employees rate an organization below 75% across 15 categories, and shown on its public profile and in rankings.

No expiry — until fixed

Unlike the Good badge, this designation stays in place until a new, verified round of surveys re-audits the workplace.

Re-survey available

Employers can request a re-survey once real change has been made. Our team coordinates a fresh, verified survey window.

Response encouraged

Organizations can post a public response on their profile. Candidates and investors tend to read silence as confirmation.

Fraud-checked

Every response is checked for IP, device and duplicate patterns, so coordinated brigading is filtered out before scores publish.

Category diagnostic

The public report shows exactly which of the 15 categories dragged the score down, such as leadership, pay, safety or toxicity.

Right to appeal

Employers may file a written appeal on methodology or fraud grounds. Our review committee responds within 10 business days.

Employee protected

Individual respondents are never named. All data is aggregated and anonymized before it is published.

Why a Worst Workplace verdict is actually useful for employers

A low score is uncomfortable, but it's also the cheapest, most honest culture data an organization will ever get — and the earliest possible chance to act on it.

Early-warning diagnostic

Surfaces culture risk while it's still fixable, well before it shows up as attrition spikes or a wave of public Glassdoor reviews.

Free, honest data

No engagement vendor will hand you unfiltered, anonymous employee sentiment for free. This is the same data, without the sales pitch.

Category-level root causes

Instead of a vague morale problem, you get a ranked breakdown of exactly which categories, like leadership or pay, are driving the score.

A documented improvement path

Fix, re-survey, re-certify: a clear, timestamped record that change happened, useful for HR, leadership and the board alike.

A recoverable talent brand

Organizations that visibly act and re-certify often turn the story into proof of a listening culture, not a permanent scar.

Evidence for the board

Investors and boards increasingly ask how culture risk is being managed. A dated diagnostic and re-survey plan is exactly that evidence.

What happens next

A simple, documented roadmap from diagnostic to re-certification.

01
Diagnose

Read the category-level report and identify the two or three areas actually driving the score down.

02
Act

Make real, visible changes tied to those categories, not cosmetic gestures or one-off announcements.

03
Re-survey

After at least 90 days, open a fresh verified survey window so employees can confirm what changed.

04
Re-certify

Clear 75% and the Worst designation is retired, automatically replaced by a Good Place to Work certificate.

Public notice preview

Sample of the public notice attached to organizations that fall below the 75% threshold.

Public workplace notice
Worst Workplace to Work™
Issued against
Ironvale Holdings, LLC

Verified employee satisfaction score of 42%, below the 75% threshold across 15 independently audited workplace categories.

Overall
42%
Reported by
86
Valid until
Re-survey
Worst categories
LeadershipPsychological SafetyToxic BehaviourSalary
Scan to verify
Verified Culture Certification Authority
Independent workplace audit · Appeal within 10 days
Issued
July 2026

Common causes

Most Worst designations can be traced back to one or more of these root failures.

Chronic toxicity

Bullying, cliques, retaliation, or normalized bad behavior reported independently by multiple respondents.

Broken leadership

Executives seen as dishonest, unavailable, or self-serving, leaving employees with little trust in stated direction.

Underpayment

Compensation significantly below market rate, or basic benefits framed as perks rather than fair pay.

Psychological unsafety

Employees cannot raise concerns without fear of career damage, exclusion, or retaliation.

The path off the list

There is one route off the list: fix what employees flagged, then let them verify the change.

01
Read the diagnostic

The public report identifies which categories failed. Start there, not with a PR statement.

02
Fix, don't spin

Address the specific categories that failed. Cosmetic gestures, like posters or one-off town halls, will not move employee-verified scores.

03
Request a re-survey

After at least 90 days of documented change, request a fresh survey window from your organization profile.

04
Re-certify publicly

If the new round clears 75%, the Worst designation is retired and a Good Place to Work certificate issues automatically.

Employer rights

  • Right to a public response on the organization profile.
  • Right to appeal on methodology or fraud grounds within 10 business days.
  • Right to request a re-survey after 90 days of documented change.
  • Right to see aggregate scores and category-level diagnostics (never individual responses).

Common questions

Is this defamation?

No. The designation is based on aggregated, verified employee ratings collected under a published methodology, and every score is factual and sourced.

Can we pay to remove it?

No. The designation cannot be bought, removed or altered by payment of any kind. The only way off the list is a new, employee-verified survey window.

Can we sue employees?

Individual respondents remain anonymous and are protected from identification. Attempts at retaliation are grounds for the designation to remain in place.

How do we contest a specific claim?

File an appeal through the Contact page. If methodology or fraud filtering was misapplied, we investigate and correct it publicly.

Help surface the truth, so it can be fixed

Anonymous, work-email verified, and fraud-checked — a few minutes to give a workplace the honest, actionable data it needs to improve.